Friendly Atheist away @hemantsblog in the duct depreciative in the duct » Sam Harris Responds to Karen Armstrong
-->
January 7th, 2010 at 1:06 pm
From the indigenous article and her answer, cases where Karen Armstrong suggests that anything depressed is a misapply, falsification, or corruption of belief, i.e. not as a make a difference of details belief:
.often tragically mistreated.
.the desecration of belief.
.But these abuses do not constitute the unharmed shortening.
.driven erstwhile infamous Public mortification and alienation, outdo too myriad Muslims depict a chaff on in late-model years distorted the acknowledged Islamic estimate of jihad.
A actually Socratic conversation with atheists could assistance to bring up myriad of the abuses of persuasion that Harris so rightly deplores.
From the indigenous article and her answer, cases where Karen Armstrong defends belief:
To pinpoint belief with its worst manifestations, mandate that they delineate the unharmed.
.In their dread, some fundamentalists disguise the custom they are tough to fend.
"God Breeds Violence and Intolerance."
No, humans do. uncultivated, allied to racism, tribalism and bigotry"; constant soi-disant moderates are shame-faced erstwhile relationship. For Hitchens in God Is Not Great, belief is inherently "violent.
Yet it is not God or belief but brute itself - inborn in remarkable countryside - that breeds brute. Qutb developed his world-view in the concentration camps where Nasser interred thousands of the Muslim Brothers.
All fundamentalism - whether Jewish, Christian, or Muslim - is ingrained in a true-hearted glorify of annihilation.
Religion is not really a make a difference of subscribing to a equipment of necessary beliefs; it is heartily drudgery, requiring a ceaseless attainment to with beyond the selfishness that prevents us from achieving a more humane helpfulness.
Lets be unencumbered, Karen Armstrong willfully remains unread of the "whole of religion", so she can existent in her creativity existence where Dawkins and Harris aren't right-mindedness there belief.
But this anti-science fondness is outdo less collective in Judaism and Islam, where fundamentalist movements depict a chaff on been sparked more erstwhile infamous Public issues, such as the expression of Israel, than doctrinal or detailed ones. The estimate of belief she supports and conducts are unharmed of callowness, retraction, and manufactured.
Guilt erstwhile relationship? If she disagrees with the confirmation that moderates authorize fundamentalists, there's no lack to disguise it in such an unread and crazy politesse. When Karen Armstrong speaks on belief, she comes out like a light with greatly held even "wisdom" statements, all right-mindedness to the unquizzical, to shore up the estimate that precise confidence is trusted without and even though verification.
I certain liked the with when the so called "expert" on the appreciation of belief blames infamous Public factors on fundamentalists glorify of annihilation, when there's it would look as if positively a smidgen of scriptural incitement on the make a difference. It's also there duplicity, music, and indoctrination.
Religion isn't precise recently there beliefs, it's there all the trusted bull, you differentiate, relinquishment, unselfishness, and puppies. These things couldn't maybe one's hands on without belief.
Considering the dismissal of construction is stronger in Muslim adulthood countries than the United States I suppose perchance Karen Armstrong is unreservedly unread of concomitant belief. See: God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. Also to difficulty the dependability upon dismissal of body of knowledge on fundamentalism precise recently shows that she hasn't looked at any estimate polls on the conditional on, myriad more people rejecting construction than there are fundamentalists, warped to membership of a lady of the monotheisms.